Showing posts with label UC Riverside. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UC Riverside. Show all posts

Friday, November 25, 2011

UC Riverside Post Game: Opening Strong


The Burn Offense is Alive and Well...in Riverside, California
While it might seem far fetched that a basketball team can create a 25 point winning margin on just 58 (plus or minus 1?) possessions, that is precisely what Villanova did in their first round game with University of California Riverside of the 76 Classic in Anaheim, California. Looking at last season's kenpom ratings this would make some sense, the Wildcats obtained the highest rating among the eight schools invited to participate; UC Riverside had the lowest. Two things happened on the way to the first round...first, the balance of the field was not seeded in the anticipated 1-8, 2-7, 3-6, 4-5 fashion that one might have expected, and second, the kenpom ratings changed to reflect games played this season, and Villanova fell to #3 according to the kenpom system. The field was seeded to insure an "East-West" game for the finals. The only team in Villanova's bracket not from the Mississippi or east was UC Riverside, the team most likely to lose their first round game. All of the teams in the other bracket come from west of the Mississippi River Valley, Oklahoma, clearly a "southwestern" team is the most easterly team in the bracket. Villanova dismantled UC Riverside 71-46 in the most decisive game so far in the Wildcats' the 2011-12 schedule. The final will feature an East-West match.

The Highlanders held onto the lead for over 10 minutes in the first half. The shot clock, not a hot shooting hand or control of the offensive boards was the key. The Highlanders typically took 20-30 seconds off the clock before they took a field goal attempt. The Wildcats would more often than not gather the defensive rebound and respond with a shot (often a miss) anywhere from four to twenty seconds into the shot clock. That tactic, to "shorten" the game by burning the clock, is an often employed strategy by an overmatched underdog. It makes sense too; by limiting the scoring opportunities the underdog can, in theory, keep the score close, maximizing the impact of high reward offensive tactics like the three point attempt. By the 11 minute mark however, the Highlanders, overmatched on height, had no more fouls to give, and the Wildcats' offense began to grind them down. Freshman off guard Darrun Hilliard hit a three at the 9:30 mark putting Villanova up by one 15-14, and the Wildcats were not headed again. Once on top, the 'Cats took a 17-2 run to close out the half...and the game.

The bloggers over at Nova Blog and VUHoops.com attributed UC Riverside's 11 minute lead to hot shooting (the Highlanders) and sloppy play (the Wildcats), both of which were true. Sort of. UC Riverside did score in their first three possessions (which consumed over two minutes on the game clock), but those seven points were half of their entire point production through the first 11 minutes of the half. It took the Highlanders another nine minutes to scored their next seven points. And seven more minutes to score their next two (and last of the half) points. Villanova did go an appalling 2-9 from the field while they were down on the Highlanders, but stayed within contact by shooting 6-6 from the line. While the Highlanders committed seven fouls (putting the 'Cats in the bonus) with a single turnover over that time period, the 'Cats committed four fouls and one turnover by contrast. The University site posted their AP wire story. The official boxscore is also posted. The breakdown by halves

OpponentUC Riverside 
 1st2ndGame 
Pace30.028.358.3
 Offense Defense
1st2ndGame1st2ndGame
Rating106.7137.6121.753.4105.878.9
eFG%41.753.048.225.045.835.0
TORate13.314.113.723.324.724.0
OR%27.864.745.728.642.934.3
FTA/FGA58.312.131.626.933.330.0
FTM/FGA50.012.128.111.533.322.0
ARate62.531.341.733.310.018.8
Blk%0.06.13.53.84.24.0
Stl%0.07.23.59.96.98.5
PPWS1.041.121.080.551.080.81
2FG%30.848.142.531.347.139.4
3FG%36.450.041.210.028.617.6
FT%85.7100.088.942.9100.073.3
%2FG25.066.747.962.553.356.5
%3FG37.523.129.618.820.019.6
%FT37.510.322.518.826.723.9

Half Time Adjustments
Villanova broke on top in the first because, though their eFG% was poor enough to be down at the half, was better than the Highlanders...shot defense. The Wildcats took care of the ball (see turnover rate) while forcing turnovers by UC Riverside. Second half stats show improved (reflected in the score margins, which ranged as high as 30 late in the second period, ultimately settling in at 25) shot efficiency (eFG%) coupled with much better offensive rebounding rates, even as the Wildcats continued to care for the ball (see turnover rate). The half-over-half steep drop in free throw rate (FTA/FGA) is most likely a reflection of the Highlanders' foul difficulties -- their bigs had to be careful, which may also account for the dramatic increase in Villanova's offensive rebounding rate (24.8 to 64.7).

Notes & Observations
1. The staff appears to have fixed on the starting five, using Maalik Wayns at the point with Darrun Hilliard and Dom Cheek rounding out the back court/wing sports, with James Bell playing the "#4" and Mouphtaou Yarou at the #5. The staff called the numbers for a total of 10 players who were alloted playing time ranging from eight minutes (freshman Ty Johnson again) up to 35 minutes (Wayns). Freshman Achraf Yacoubou drew a modestly surprising 20 minutes, due most likely to Bell's foul problems. Freshman JayVaughn Pinkston played for 17 minutes while fellow freshman Markus Kennedy drew 12 minutes.
2. Yarou and Wayns asserted themselves as hoped for. Yarou scored a double-double on 11 points and 10 rebounds. Wayns chipped in a game-high 23 points while the 'Cats had two others, Hilliard (12 points) and Bell (12 points) who also notched double digit minutes. Bell's 12 points were scored in 13 minutes of play, all that could be safely allocated given his foul problems.

3. A crucial and welcomed stat is the point distribution, highlighted in green above. Though Villanova shooters were hitting their three point attempts at a 50% clip, but the guards did not drop out to the arc and start jacking threes. Note points from two point attempts in the second half was 66%, and overall threes accounted for under 30% of the point production. Given the point margin was +20 through much of the second half the back court showed discipline and good judgement by not stepping back taking threes. They also insured that a cold streak would not let the Highlanders back into the game.

4. Wayns took about 40% of the possessions and 38% of the shots when he was on the court. This time he combined high usage with high efficiency, for the kind of production that will earn him some national attention. I have just about accepted the idea that he will be a volumn shooter, not a role I would like to see. Against programs like UC Riverside however, it works. He draws (defensive) attention, which should benefit second and third scoring options like Hilliard, Yarou and Yacoubou, both of whom took between 11% and 21% of the shots. Bell took a surprising 31% of the shots, but consider how little time he actually logged.

5. UC Riverside was paced by Daymond Cowlah, who scored 10 points on 4-7 (2-4 from threes, 2-3 from inside the arc). Team-high rebounding was shared by T.J. Burke and Elliot Berry.

6. Coach Jay Wright, as noted by VUSports.com, logged win #350 for his career.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

According to Glockner...Villanova's Out of Conference Slate


What's In a Name?
Sport Illustrated columnist Andy Glockner joined a growing list of talkig heads who have come to dispise -- and publicly admonish offenders -- those BCS "powerhouses" who pad their win totals with out of conference cupcakes. Long a problem recognized by the NCAA come tournament selection time (whose 24 wins are "better"?) and fans who have to sit through a 21st century equivalent of Christians vs. Lions for nearly two monthes, the topic "Who Has the Softest Out of Conference Schedule?" has letely become a favorite preseason preview topic. While the Selection Committee uses RPI and SOS metrics to determine how challenged a particular team might have been during the season, Glockner puts together a quick list (sort of a "You know you've scheduled a cupcake if..." test) of names to be avoided when scheduling an opponent. According to Glockner, "...Generally speaking, your team has scheduled a too-easy home win if the opponent's name has:

1) Any type of punctuation mark (ampersand, apostrophe, hyphen, period)
2) Any in-state directional notation
3) Any State that is not actually named for a state
4) Any name of a religion in it
5) Any affiliation with the SWAC, which is 2-213 over the past six seasons vs. teams in BCS conferences...(and the MEAC corollary mentioned later in his article

While Glockner takes Cincinnati and Louisville to task and gives Syracuse and Connecticut (dis)Honorable Mentions, he passes on Villanova. The Nova Nation is notorious for giving the program a hard time about the Wildcats' OOC, but how does Villanova's schedule stand up to the "Glockner Test"?

The 'Cats Score...
Big 5 opponent Saint Joseph's makes the list due to their apostrophe, though truth be told the Hawks should be better this season than their 11-22 record from 2011. Villanova will travel to the Hagan rather than the Palestra, for this game, removing any "location" advantage the 'Cats might have expected. Villanova's first round opponent in the 76 Classic, UC Riverside qualifies under Rule #2 (directional notation, in this case "Riverside"). The balance of the 76 field (no team ranked in the top 25 RPI from 2011, four teams #36-#82 in 2011, three teams ranked #125-#175 in 2011) is a bit underwhelming as well, but given the loss of seniors Fisher, Stokes and Pena, the remaining six opponents in the field are hardly pushovers for this season's squad. But UC Riverside, ranked at #259 in 2011 (RPI) is clearly the lowest seed in the field. Other possible qualifiers include American. Though the Eagles were ranked (a not too shabby) #127 last season, would being named after a country (a people?) qualify under #3? Probably not. Some Nova fans might wonder if Temple is named after a religion (rule #4). I am going to go with a No on that, especially since the Owls are one of the teams favored to win the Atlantic-10 Conference this season and went to the NCAAs in 2011 (and advanced farther in the field than the Wildcats).

Glockner's Score...
With an apostrophe school (that they take on the road) coupled with an assigned "directional" opponent, Villanova's OOC would seem to relatively cupcake-free. Long time Big 5 fans know that the 'Cats have had their way lately with La Salle and Penn, and that the presence of Boston University on the schedule was a nod to since-departed former Assistant Coach Pat Chambers (look for Penn State next season?), but those three, along with Temple and Saint Joseph's, were scheduled for reasons not related to roughage (traditions and Villanova family ties, etc.). Given the Wildcats return 44% of the minutes and 43% of the points scored from 2011, the slate of OOC opponents assembled will most likely yield two -- probably more -- losses going into conference play.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

The 76 Classic -- A Too Early Look



Seeding the Field
The 76 Classic, along with a handful of other ESPN-facilitated early season invitational tournaments (Coaches vs Cancer, CBE Classic, Charleston Classic, Puerto Rico Tip-Off, Old Spice Classic...) released their brackets on Wednesday and Thursday. Coming as "Summer Reports" wind down and the foreign tours swing into play, this latest 2012 tease could not be timed better. Chris Dobbertean over at Blogging the Bracket has done an excellent job, and if your favorite team is in any early season invitational the best place to track breaking developments and news is on Chris' Early Season Events page.

Each invitational committee sets the brackets, and unlike the NCAA and NIT tournaments, there may or may not be any relation between the quality of the teams and who they play in their bracket. I sorted the eight team field for the 76 Classic (alphabetically they are Boston College, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Saint Louis, Santa Clara, UC Riverside, Villanova, and Washington State) by their 2011 RPI (below) to see how closely the match-ups and brackets came to an actual seed...

2011 Season2012 Returning
RPIWLMins.Pts.
Villanova36211252.346.8
Boston College58211317.39.7
New Mexico66221380.878.8
Washington State82221366.954.7
Oklahoma126141878.475.4
Santa Clara158241462.374.7
Saint Louis175121992.896.3
UC Riverside259121983.380.3

The field contains names even the casual fan should recognize (Villanova, Boston College, Washington State, Oklahoma) with a mix of local teams (Santa Clara and UC Riverside) to go with familiar coaches (Rick Majerus). If Villanova is indeed seeded #1 overall and UC Riverside #8 (as their RPIs suggest), then the announced match-ups show some resemblance to the "seed-by-RPI" approach...with a few concessions to ratings and local attendance. Boston College loses over 80% of their minutes and (even more of their) scoring from 2011. A second seed overall in the field was too high. The organizers wanted a competitive "East vs West" final as the first round match-ups, with RPI-based seeds below suggest...

RPI
SeedTeam
1Villanova
8UC Riverside
7Saint Louis
2Boston College
4Washington State
5Oklahoma
6Santa Clara
3New Mexico

...and they should get it as one of Villanova or Saint Louis (or Boston College) will most likely emerge from the upper bracket (as presented in the tournament's downloadable bracket -- the "East Bracket"? -- the first two match-ups above) to face Washington State, New Mexico or Oklahoma from the lower bracket (the "West Bracket"). A quick look at the "East Bracket", paired by first round match-ups...

2011 Adjusted
PaceOff.Def.PWP
Villanova66.1113.695.20.884
UC Riverside65.695.1106.90.206
Boston College63.9115.5103.70.755
Saint Louis65.197.094.10.586

A basic log5 calculation using 2011 season-ending PWPs would install Villanova as a heavy favorite to beat the UC Riverside (90%) with Boston College a strong favorite over Saint Louis (69%). Villanova and Boston College will both feature (to varying degrees) changes to their 2011 rosters, in sharp contrast to both UC Riverside and Saint Louis, both of which return over 80% of their 2011 rosters. That alone should scramble those projections a bit before tip-off, as pretournament PWPs from 2012 action should bear out. Though Villanova returns about half of their minutes and (just) less than half of their scoring -- well below the percentages returned by UC Riverside, proximity to the arena is about the only advantage held by the Highlanders. The Highlanders managed a -0.083 efficiency margin in (Big West) conference play last season. A conference ranked #17 out of 34 in Division 1. The roster had one player 6-8 (forward Kevin Bradshaw) and three others at 6-7 (forwards Tyquan Brown, Elliott Berry and B.J. Shearry. Yarou, Sutton and freshman Markus Kennedy should be tough match-ups for them. Overall, the talent gap may be wide enough to negate Villanova's relative inexperience. The Boston College - Saint Louis game on the other hand, offers probably the best opportunity for a first round upset. BC's second year coach Steve Donahue is charged with virtually rebuilding the roster as he brings in a huge nine man freshman class, of whom pf Ryan Anderson, center Kyle Caudill, sg Lonnie Jackson and pg Jordan Daniels are the liked best by recruiting gurus. Of the 14 names listed on the 2011-12 roster, only five are from the sophomore (2), junior (1) or senior (2) classes. To the 90% returning roster, Saint Louis' Rick Majerus will also have Kwamain Mitchell, an All-A-10 guard noted for his clutch scoring in 2010, but suspended just before the 2010-11 season and Jake Barnett, a 6-5 forward transfer from Toledo University, who is eligible to play this season and practiced with the Billikens last season.

The "West Bracket" offers Left Coast fans a lot of familiar names and conferences. The pairings should also offer more competitive first and second round games, as any three of the four teams in the bracket can put together a two or three game run. Again I have paired the teams by first round game to make comparisons easier...

2011 Adjusted
PaceOff.Def.PWP
Washington State68.5106.594.00.808
Oklahoma65.3103.0100.90.560
New Mexico65.9111.895.90.854
Santa Clara68.0106.9102.00.632

By 2011 PWPs, New Mexico is strongly favored to defeat Santa Clara (77%), with Washington State equally favored to beat Oklahoma (76%), those two projected to meet in the second round with the winner facing the "East Bracket" winner in the championship game. The Lobos will feature a team built around a backcourt of Drew Gordon and Phillip McDonald with a front court manned by Kendall Williams and A.J. Hardeman. The Santa Clara Broncos return nearly 75% of their scoring from 2011, will look to guard Kevin Foster, Evan Roquemore and Canadian forward Marc Trasolini to jump start their offense. Foster took a whopping 31% of the shots when he was on the court, while Roquemore posted a very efficient 109.4 points per 100 possessions last season. Washington State returns a nucleus that features guard Faisal Aden along with forwards DeAngelo Casto and Australian Brock Motum. Oklahoma may bring back more minutes and scoring, but the wildcard may prove to be Lon Kruger, hired after Coach Jeff Capel was fired last March. Coach Kruger's history at Nevada Las Vegas suggests he will push the tempo for the Sooners, rely more on three point attempts in his offense even as he clamps down on defense (his UNLV teams routinely posted defensive efficiencies ranging between 0.91 and 0.93 points per possessions. His early UNLV teams allowed about 0.98 ppp, an improvement over the Sooners' 1.01 defensive ppp in Capel's last season.

Further Reading...
The Official 76 Classic Site
where the brackets are listed.
Other Early Season Invitationals with teams, dates and sites. From Blogging the Bracket.